请参照http://www.radida.com/radinet/read.php?tid=4583给出你的测试结果，我分析一下，应该不会那么慢的。作者: wangxiechen 时间: 2006-7-27 05:16
我有同感作者: 13081830109 时间: 2006-7-27 06:16
是速度较慢作者: 牟言科 时间: 2006-7-27 07:28
近几天来感觉的确是慢！作者: 狙击手 时间: 2006-7-27 18:33
时慢时快，唉，我这急脾气！作者: wnlyq8688 时间: 2006-7-28 20:27
陕西渭南
电信宽带
microsoft windows xp [版本 5.1.2600]
(c) 版权所有 1985-2001 microsoft corp.
c:\\documents and settings\\zhy>ping www.radida.com
pinging www.radida.com [218.246.22.226] with 32 bytes of data:
reply from 218.246.22.226: bytes=32 time=279ms ttl=109
reply from 218.246.22.226: bytes=32 time=278ms ttl=109
reply from 218.246.22.226: bytes=32 time=276ms ttl=109
request timed out.
ping statistics for 218.246.22.226:
packets: sent = 4, received = 3, lost = 1 (25% loss),
approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
minimum = 276ms, maximum = 279ms, average = 277ms
c:\\documents and settings\\zhy>tracert www.radida.com
tracing route to www.radida.com [218.246.22.226]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 218.195.40.254
2 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 218.195.47.134
3 <1 ms <1 ms 3 ms 218.195.47.61
4 4 ms 6 ms 3 ms 202.200.28.193
5 5 ms 7 ms 5 ms 202.112.53.141
6 26 ms 21 ms 25 ms 202.112.36.213
7 45 ms 64 ms 44 ms 202.112.36.114
8 52 ms 43 ms 47 ms 202.112.36.250
9 58 ms 55 ms 54 ms 202.112.36.254
10 62 ms 60 ms 59 ms 202.112.53.202
11 * * 248 ms 202.97.15.201
12 * * 259 ms 202.97.44.169
13 283 ms 287 ms 294 ms 202.97.34.230
14 266 ms 270 ms 280 ms 221.238.222.214
15 270 ms * 282 ms 221.239.7.82
16 413 ms 513 ms * 221.239.126.98
17 268 ms * 307 ms 211.167.80.202
18 * 281 ms 277 ms 218.246.22.226